I know there is another thread in the 388 delays
and apologies for a new thread, hopefully not redundant
I am a regular (once to twice a month in F) on the above flights, and over the years when there are flown by the 388 I have experienced all sorts of disruptions
Only the bravery of individual members of the Concorde team in LA in bending the rules and my personal insight and anticipation of issues have gotten me to my final destination with reasonable delays
I noted, on flying the Emirates 388 DXB-LAX-DXB (a 4-5 times a year occurrence for me) , that over the past 365 dats NOT ONE cancellation has occurred.
At a time when BAC asks us for further financial commitment to keep our status, is it legit to suspect that significant cost cutting is going into timely aircraft maintenance and personnel? Or these stark differences in performance of the same aircraft type are to be attributed only to sheer luck?
and apologies for a new thread, hopefully not redundant
I am a regular (once to twice a month in F) on the above flights, and over the years when there are flown by the 388 I have experienced all sorts of disruptions
Only the bravery of individual members of the Concorde team in LA in bending the rules and my personal insight and anticipation of issues have gotten me to my final destination with reasonable delays
I noted, on flying the Emirates 388 DXB-LAX-DXB (a 4-5 times a year occurrence for me) , that over the past 365 dats NOT ONE cancellation has occurred.
At a time when BAC asks us for further financial commitment to keep our status, is it legit to suspect that significant cost cutting is going into timely aircraft maintenance and personnel? Or these stark differences in performance of the same aircraft type are to be attributed only to sheer luck?